THIS CONTENT IS FREE TO ALL MEMBERSHIP LEVELS
LOGIN; or JOIN at our FREE membership level
Then enter your name, email and click download to send your content to you email

564 words

SAVE TIME! We can BROADCAST this content directly to your web site. Contact us for details. 

Search Contributor/Columnist photo gallery

Gerry BowlerThe Great Plague of 2020 has revealed some interesting things about Western society’s attitudes toward old people.

In Italy, the shortage of medical equipment to treat patients suffering from COVID-19 led hospitals to sometimes rule that people over the age of 60 couldn’t be fully treated. That was essentially a death sentence for some pensioners.

In England and Wales, some care homes reportedly issued blanket do-not-resuscitate orders for their elderly clients. There have also been reports that doctors have refused to visit seniors’ residences where the virus has struck and have denied them admittance to hospitals.

In Canada, the fate of elders dying untended by the dozens in care homes is front-page news.

It’s not just that this crisis suggests that the elderly are little valued in comparison to other segments of the population. It’s that, for some people, the way the pandemic kills off the aged is a positive blessing.

Said one Twitter contributor: “Corona virus is killing pretty much just old people. It sounds like Earth is getting revenge for them destroying literally the entire planet and not caring about it.”

Others pointed out gleefully that since the American elderly vote disproportionately for Republican candidates, the plague means less chance of a Donald Trump presidential re-election.

These attitudes aren’t simply the product of a society making desperate calculations about triage in a health-care emergency. They reveal a genuine hostility on the part of the young toward the old, especially the baby boomer generation.

Children of the 1945-to-1965 baby boom, the largest age cohort in history, are blamed for ruining the economy, selfishly hogging all the good jobs and posing a threat to funding of government programs. This animosity will shape public policy for years to come.

We see this not just among lack-wits on social media, but in the thinking of some people in high places.

Late in the last century, Richard Lamm, the governor of Colorado, made a speech in which he spoke of a “duty to die.” He said, “We’ve got a duty to die and get out of the way with all of our machines and artificial hearts and everything else like that and let the other society, our kids, build a reasonable life.”

This sentiment is echoed by Ezekiel Emanuel, a doctor and medical ethicist. He has claimed that life after the age of 75 wasn’t worth living. By that age, he said, “creativity, originality, and productivity are pretty much gone for the vast, vast majority of us.”

Such perspectives reduce the value of human life to a matter of money: the old aren’t making big bucks anymore and it costs plenty to keep them alive, so don’t save them in a crisis. Just encourage them to get off the bus early.

The liberalization of medically-assisted death laws will add heat to this generational warfare. As the number of boomers entering retirement age swells, there will be more calls for the old not to selfishly cling to life.

Social pressure on the old will increase. It will soon be seen as bad manners to live into your 80s, a waste of resources and a drain on the young.

After that, it will be just a short step to an arbitrary, mandatory – but doubtless humane – end at the hands of a government department.

Gerry Bowler is a senior fellow at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.

© Troy Media


Old people under attack care old

The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.

© Troy Media – All Rights Reserved
Troy Media provides editorial content to media outlets and its own hosted community news outlets across Canada
  Terms and Conditions of use